Super Hot: EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM for $539.19 via Woot!


UPDATE: Sold out in 28 minutes.

Woot! (owned by Amazon) has the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM for only $539.19. This is the “Mark I” old version of the lens. This is a “Prime Exclusive” deal that is only available to Amazon Prime members. Compare with a regular price of $1099.

Woot!‘s site doesn’t indicate that it’s open box or refurbished, so you can assume that it is brand new.

A limited quantity is available — this will likely sell out. Their site indicates that the item comes with a Woot 90-day warranty (we think this may to be avoid MAP restrictions). It is however still a great deal, a better price than what is usually available through the used or grey market.



See deal archive for:
If you purchase something through a link on our site, we may get a small share of the sale (at no cost to you). Please read our disclosure for more info.

Subscribe to get alerts about new deals

Receive email alerts. Enable?
Other ways to follow us

6 comments on “Super Hot: EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM for $539.19 via Woot!

  1. Jacob
    June 10, 2020 at 10:01 pm EDT

    So many brand new ones on eBay for even cheaper. Not that great of a deal.

    1. CanonPriceWatch
      June 10, 2020 at 10:04 pm EDT

      This one is brand new. (Woot would mark it as a “refurbished” if it was refurbished.)

      I don’t see brand new prices for this lens on eBay for less than $789. Make sure you’re not accidentally looking at the non-IS version of this lens.

      1. Jacob
        June 11, 2020 at 12:29 am EDT

        I stand corrected. I was looking at the non IS version. Turns out this was a great deal.

    2. CanonPriceWatch
      June 10, 2020 at 10:09 pm EDT

      Also, given that this is now sold out within 30 minutes of our post, I think the Internet disagrees with you 🙂

    3. LouieV
      June 10, 2020 at 10:32 pm EDT

      Why you always lying? lol. No new ones anywhere near this price on eBay.

      1. Jacob
        June 11, 2020 at 12:31 am EDT

        It was an honest mistake. I didn’t know there were two versions. IS vs Non IS. I was looking at the latter.

Leave a Reply to Jacob Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *