Refurbished RF 100-400mm IS USM for $379 — Lowest Price Seen Yet!


Another hidden gem in the refurb sale at the Canon Direct Store is the RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM — it’s now available refurbished for $379.00, which is the lowest price seen yet, and a total 41% savings from the regular brand new price of $649.

Check out our refurbished stock tracker for a list of all items available. Refurbished items from the Canon Direct Store come with a 1-year Canon USA warranty.



See deal archive for:
If you purchase something through a link on our site, we may get a small share of the sale (at no cost to you). Please read our disclosure for more info.

Subscribe to get alerts about new deals

Receive email alerts. Enable?
Other ways to follow us

5 comments on “Refurbished RF 100-400mm IS USM for $379 — Lowest Price Seen Yet!

  1. June 14, 2023 at 8:05 pm EDT

    This is a no-brainer must buy at this price!

  2. 001aa
    June 14, 2023 at 9:50 pm EDT

    Hmm, this is a great price. However, I own a Sigma EF 150-600 C, which I bought back in 2016 for $699. Would this be any better than that? The reviews I saw suggest this lens is actually quite a bit worse than the Sigma. Except the AF, which is really quite bad on the Sigma using the Canon EF-RF control ring adapter. Should I get this in addition? The price is fantastic.

    1. CanonPriceWatch
      June 14, 2023 at 10:01 pm EDT

      I’m a huge fan of the Sigma C 150-600mm. The big difference for me is the weight. If you do any walkaround type photography, the RF 100-400 is probably much more versatile lens at one third the weight — missing 50% on the telephoto end though.

    2. nickli
      June 14, 2023 at 11:54 pm EDT

      How bad is the AF of Sigma EF 150-600 C with the EF-RF adapter? Could you please share the review that you saw?

    3. David S.
      June 15, 2023 at 8:53 am EDT

      Ultimately, it depends on your use-case scenarios. If you use the Sigma to shoot birds, then no, this Canon does you no good. As a walk-around telephoto lens, then this one might be OK for you.

      For me, the price is very enticing. But at f5.6 to f8, I don’t foresee myself needing this. That f8 on the long end removes it from 75% of my shooting scenarios.

Leave a Reply to Daniel Fazzari Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *